Spain vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Spain
0.0539 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0513 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain rank
129th
Tunisia rank
132nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Spain
  • Tunisia
0.020.040.06197019962023

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0.0539 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0513 million SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0026 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Spain's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 132nd of 180 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0273 million SLC per square kilometre 0.017 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0104 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
1980s 0.0323 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0212 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.043 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0303 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0126 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.0519 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0399 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0121 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.0575 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0509 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2020s 0.0569 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0561 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Spain or Tunisia?
Spain, at 0.0539 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0513 million SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Spain and Tunisia?
0.0026 million SLC per square kilometre, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Spain and Tunisia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Spain ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/spain/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/spain/tunisia/">Spain vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.