Guatemala vs Marshall Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Guatemala
8.48 % change on previous year
in 2024
Marshall Islands
8.45 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala rank
75th
Marshall Islands rank
76th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Guatemala
  • Marshall Islands
-2002040197119972024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 8.48 % change on previous year against 8.45 % change on previous year in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.03 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Guatemala ranks 75th and Marshall Islands ranks 76th of 214 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Marshall Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 14.6 % change on previous year 13.33 % change on previous year 1.27 % change on previous year Guatemala
1980s 13.66 % change on previous year 11.34 % change on previous year 2.32 % change on previous year Guatemala
1990s 18.34 % change on previous year 3.86 % change on previous year 14.48 % change on previous year Guatemala
2000s 7.73 % change on previous year 5.03 % change on previous year 2.71 % change on previous year Guatemala
2010s 5.01 % change on previous year 13.18 % change on previous year 8.17 % change on previous year Marshall Islands
2020s 9.29 % change on previous year 8.05 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Guatemala or Marshall Islands?
Guatemala, at 8.48 % change on previous year against 8.45 % change on previous year in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Guatemala and Marshall Islands?
0.03 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Marshall Islands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Marshall Islands rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Guatemala ranks 75th and Marshall Islands ranks 76th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Marshall Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth/guatemala/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth/guatemala/marshall-islands/">Guatemala vs Marshall Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 10,576 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.