Antigua and Barbuda vs Libya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0012 million SLC per person
in 2024
Libya
0.0011 million SLC per person
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
122nd
Libya rank
125th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Libya
000.0010.0010.0010.001197019972024

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0012 million SLC per person against 0.0011 million SLC per person in Libya, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 122nd and Libya ranks 125th of 180 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Libya Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0004 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0006 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0007 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0011 million SLC per person 0.0009 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Antigua and Barbuda or Libya?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0012 million SLC per person against 0.0011 million SLC per person in Libya as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Antigua and Barbuda and Libya?
0.0001 million SLC per person, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Libya?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Libya rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 122nd and Libya ranks 125th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Libya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/libya/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Libya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.