How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Grenada?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Grenada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Barbados

0.0009 million SLC per person

in 2024

Grenada

0.0009 million SLC per person

in 2024

Barbados rank

132nd

Grenada rank

131st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Barbados
Grenada

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0.0009 million SLC per person against 0.0009 million SLC per person in Barbados, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 132nd and Grenada ranks 131st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Grenada	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Barbados
1980s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0006 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Grenada
1990s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0006 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Grenada
2000s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0007 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	Grenada
2010s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0012 million SLC per person	0.0005 million SLC per person	Grenada
2020s	0.0009 million SLC per person	0.0011 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Barbados or Grenada?: Grenada, at 0.0009 million SLC per person against 0.0009 million SLC per person in Barbados as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Barbados and Grenada?: 0 million SLC per person, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Grenada?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Grenada rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Barbados ranks 132nd and Grenada ranks 131st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Grenada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/barbados/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/barbados/grenada/">Barbados vs Grenada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.