How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Germany: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Belgium

0.0004 million SLC per person

in 2024

Germany

0.0004 million SLC per person

in 2024

Belgium rank

160th

Germany rank

159th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Belgium
Germany

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0.0004 million SLC per person against 0.0004 million SLC per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Germany ahead.

Belgium ranks 160th and Germany ranks 159th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Germany in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Germany	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Germany
1980s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Belgium
1990s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Belgium
2000s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Belgium
2010s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0003 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Germany
2020s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Belgium or Germany?: Germany, at 0.0004 million SLC per person against 0.0004 million SLC per person in Belgium as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Belgium and Germany?: 0 million SLC per person, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Belgium and Germany rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Belgium ranks 160th and Germany ranks 159th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Germany: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/belgium/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/belgium/germany/">Belgium vs Germany: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.