Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Burkina Faso
0.1113 million SLC per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.118 million SLC per person
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
42nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0250.050.0750.10.125197019972024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.118 million SLC per person against 0.1113 million SLC per person in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0067 million SLC per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 42nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0095 million SLC per person 0.0037 million SLC per person 0.0057 million SLC per person Burkina Faso
1980s 0.022 million SLC per person 0.0113 million SLC per person 0.0106 million SLC per person Burkina Faso
1990s 0.0352 million SLC per person 0.0199 million SLC per person 0.0153 million SLC per person Burkina Faso
2000s 0.0569 million SLC per person 0.0759 million SLC per person 0.019 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0847 million SLC per person 0.0954 million SLC per person 0.0107 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0932 million SLC per person 0.1126 million SLC per person 0.0193 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Burkina Faso or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.118 million SLC per person against 0.1113 million SLC per person in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0067 million SLC per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Burkina Faso ranks 42nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/burkina-faso/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/burkina-faso/equatorial-guinea/">Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.