How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Burundi

0.2371 million SLC per person

in 2024

Malawi

0.2437 million SLC per person

in 2024

Burundi rank

27th

Malawi rank

25th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Burundi
Malawi

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.2437 million SLC per person against 0.2371 million SLC per person in Burundi, a difference of 0.0066 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 27th and Malawi ranks 25th of 180 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0053 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0052 million SLC per person	Burundi
1980s	0.0128 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0126 million SLC per person	Burundi
1990s	0.0216 million SLC per person	0.0016 million SLC per person	0.02 million SLC per person	Burundi
2000s	0.0539 million SLC per person	0.0113 million SLC per person	0.0426 million SLC per person	Burundi
2010s	0.1432 million SLC per person	0.0555 million SLC per person	0.0877 million SLC per person	Burundi
2020s	0.2097 million SLC per person	0.1648 million SLC per person	0.0449 million SLC per person	Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Burundi or Malawi?: Malawi, at 0.2437 million SLC per person against 0.2371 million SLC per person in Burundi as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Burundi and Malawi?: 0.0066 million SLC per person, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Burundi and Malawi rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Burundi ranks 27th and Malawi ranks 25th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/burundi/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/burundi/malawi/">Burundi vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.