Equatorial Guinea vs Jamaica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Equatorial Guinea
0.118 million SLC per person
in 2024
Jamaica
0.1077 million SLC per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th
Jamaica rank
43rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Jamaica
00.0250.050.0750.10.125197019972024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.118 million SLC per person against 0.1077 million SLC per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0103 million SLC per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Jamaica ranks 43rd of 180 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Jamaica Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0037 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0036 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0113 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person 0.0109 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0199 million SLC per person 0.0059 million SLC per person 0.0139 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0759 million SLC per person 0.0134 million SLC per person 0.0625 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0954 million SLC per person 0.0362 million SLC per person 0.0592 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.1126 million SLC per person 0.0806 million SLC per person 0.032 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Equatorial Guinea or Jamaica?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.118 million SLC per person against 0.1077 million SLC per person in Jamaica as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Equatorial Guinea and Jamaica?
0.0103 million SLC per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Jamaica?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Jamaica rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Jamaica ranks 43rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Jamaica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/jamaica/">Equatorial Guinea vs Jamaica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.