French Polynesia vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

French Polynesia
0.0663 million SLC per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
0.0794 million SLC per person
in 2024
French Polynesia rank
51st
New Caledonia rank
48th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • French Polynesia
  • New Caledonia
00.020.040.060.080.1197019972024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0794 million SLC per person against 0.0663 million SLC per person in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0131 million SLC per person.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 51st and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0244 million SLC per person 0.0157 million SLC per person 0.0087 million SLC per person French Polynesia
1980s 0.0624 million SLC per person 0.0168 million SLC per person 0.0457 million SLC per person French Polynesia
1990s 0.0842 million SLC per person 0.0312 million SLC per person 0.053 million SLC per person French Polynesia
2000s 0.0658 million SLC per person 0.0412 million SLC per person 0.0246 million SLC per person French Polynesia
2010s 0.0586 million SLC per person 0.0595 million SLC per person 0.0009 million SLC per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0617 million SLC per person 0.0738 million SLC per person 0.0121 million SLC per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, French Polynesia or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.0794 million SLC per person against 0.0663 million SLC per person in French Polynesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between French Polynesia and New Caledonia?
0.0131 million SLC per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and New Caledonia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do French Polynesia and New Caledonia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
French Polynesia ranks 51st and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/french-polynesia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/french-polynesia/new-caledonia/">French Polynesia vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.