How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Rwanda?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Iceland

0.429 million SLC per person

in 2024

Rwanda

0.3239 million SLC per person

in 2024

Iceland rank

16th

Rwanda rank

19th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Iceland
Rwanda

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.429 million SLC per person against 0.3239 million SLC per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1051 million SLC per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Iceland ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0014 million SLC per person	0.0065 million SLC per person	0.005 million SLC per person	Rwanda
1980s	0.0513 million SLC per person	0.0119 million SLC per person	0.0393 million SLC per person	Iceland
1990s	0.1599 million SLC per person	0.0195 million SLC per person	0.1404 million SLC per person	Iceland
2000s	0.2059 million SLC per person	0.0528 million SLC per person	0.153 million SLC per person	Iceland
2010s	0.3441 million SLC per person	0.1293 million SLC per person	0.2148 million SLC per person	Iceland
2020s	0.409 million SLC per person	0.2568 million SLC per person	0.1522 million SLC per person	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Iceland or Rwanda?: Iceland, at 0.429 million SLC per person against 0.3239 million SLC per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Iceland and Rwanda?: 0.1051 million SLC per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Rwanda?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Rwanda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Iceland ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/iceland/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/iceland/rwanda/">Iceland vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.