How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Tuvalu?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ireland vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Ireland

0.001 million SLC per person

in 2024

Tuvalu

0.0009 million SLC per person

in 2024

Ireland rank

128th

Tuvalu rank

130th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Ireland
Tuvalu

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0.001 million SLC per person against 0.0009 million SLC per person in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 128th and Tuvalu ranks 130th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ireland	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	Ireland
1980s	0.0006 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0005 million SLC per person	Ireland
1990s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	Ireland
2000s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0006 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Tuvalu
2010s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0007 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	Tuvalu
2020s	0.0009 million SLC per person	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Ireland or Tuvalu?: Ireland, at 0.001 million SLC per person against 0.0009 million SLC per person in Tuvalu as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Ireland and Tuvalu?: 0.0001 million SLC per person, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Tuvalu?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ireland and Tuvalu rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Ireland ranks 128th and Tuvalu ranks 130th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/ireland/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/ireland/tuvalu/">Ireland vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.