Jordan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Jordan
0.0002 million SLC per person
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0001 million SLC per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
173rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
174th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Jordan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0000197019972024

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0002 million SLC per person against 0.0001 million SLC per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Jordan ranks 173rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 174th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0 million SLC per person Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Jordan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Jordan, at 0.0002 million SLC per person against 0.0001 million SLC per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Jordan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0001 million SLC per person, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Jordan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Jordan ranks 173rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 174th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/jordan/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/jordan/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Jordan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.