How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tuvalu?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Kiribati

0.0009 million SLC per person

in 2024

Tuvalu

0.0009 million SLC per person

in 2024

Kiribati rank

129th

Tuvalu rank

130th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Kiribati
Tuvalu

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.0009 million SLC per person against 0.0009 million SLC per person in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Kiribati ranks 129th and Tuvalu ranks 130th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kiribati	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Tuvalu
1980s	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Tuvalu
1990s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Tuvalu
2000s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0006 million SLC per person	0.0003 million SLC per person	Tuvalu
2010s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0007 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Tuvalu
2020s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0008 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Kiribati or Tuvalu?: Kiribati, at 0.0009 million SLC per person against 0.0009 million SLC per person in Tuvalu as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Kiribati and Tuvalu?: 0 million SLC per person, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tuvalu?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Tuvalu rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Kiribati ranks 129th and Tuvalu ranks 130th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/kiribati/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/kiribati/tuvalu/">Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.