How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Panama?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Palau vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Palau

0.0005 million SLC per person

in 2024

Panama

0.0005 million SLC per person

in 2024

Palau rank

155th

Panama rank

154th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Palau
Panama

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0005 million SLC per person against 0.0005 million SLC per person in Palau, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Palau ahead.

Palau ranks 155th and Panama ranks 154th of 180 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Palau	Panama	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Palau
1980s	0.0006 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0005 million SLC per person	Palau
1990s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0006 million SLC per person	Palau
2000s	0.0004 million SLC per person	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Palau
2010s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Palau
2020s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Palau or Panama?: Panama, at 0.0005 million SLC per person against 0.0005 million SLC per person in Palau as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Palau and Panama?: 0 million SLC per person, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Panama?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Palau and Panama rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Palau ranks 155th and Panama ranks 154th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palau vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/palau/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/palau/panama/">Palau vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.