How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zambia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Qatar vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Qatar

0.0008 million SLC per person

in 2024

Zambia

0.0008 million SLC per person

in 2024

Qatar rank

135th

Zambia rank

136th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Qatar
Zambia

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0008 million SLC per person against 0.0008 million SLC per person in Zambia, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Qatar ahead.

Qatar ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 136th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Qatar	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	0.0003 million SLC per person	Qatar
1980s	0.0006 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	0.0006 million SLC per person	Qatar
1990s	0.0005 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0005 million SLC per person	Qatar
2000s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Zambia
2010s	0.0004 million SLC per person	0.0007 million SLC per person	0.0003 million SLC per person	Zambia
2020s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0007 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Qatar or Zambia?: Qatar, at 0.0008 million SLC per person against 0.0008 million SLC per person in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Qatar and Zambia?: 0 million SLC per person, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zambia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Qatar and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Qatar ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 136th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/qatar/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/qatar/zambia/">Qatar vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.