United Arab Emirates vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

United Arab Emirates
0.0013 million SLC per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0012 million SLC per person
in 2024
United Arab Emirates rank
119th
Zimbabwe rank
121st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • United Arab Emirates
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0010.0020.002197019972024

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.0013 million SLC per person against 0.0012 million SLC per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

Across all 55 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.

United Arab Emirates ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 180 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Arab Emirates Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0004 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
1980s 0.0009 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0007 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
1990s 0.0015 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0014 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
2000s 0.0018 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0017 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
2010s 0.0012 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0011 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
2020s 0.0013 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.001 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, United Arab Emirates or Zimbabwe?
United Arab Emirates, at 0.0013 million SLC per person against 0.0012 million SLC per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 million SLC per person, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
United Arab Emirates ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Arab Emirates vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/united-arab-emirates/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/united-arab-emirates/zimbabwe/">United Arab Emirates vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.