Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Afghanistan
0.7184 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.7458 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
77th
Guatemala rank
76th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Guatemala
00.20.40.60.8197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.7458 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.7184 million SLC per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0274 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 77th and Guatemala ranks 76th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre 0.005 million SLC per square kilometre 0.005 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0167 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0166 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.0143 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0978 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0835 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.1873 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2326 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0453 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.4531 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4271 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0259 million SLC per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 0.6829 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6265 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0564 million SLC per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Afghanistan or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.7458 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.7184 million SLC per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Afghanistan and Guatemala?
0.0274 million SLC per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guatemala?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Guatemala rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Afghanistan ranks 77th and Guatemala ranks 76th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/afghanistan/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/afghanistan/guatemala/">Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.