Algeria vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Algeria
1.85 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
1.64 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Algeria rank
61st
Iceland rank
64th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Algeria
  • Iceland
00.511.52197019962023

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 1.85 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.64 million SLC per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.21 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Algeria ahead.

Algeria ranks 61st and Iceland ranks 64th of 180 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0026 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0107 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1257 million SLC per square kilometre 0.115 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.083 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4252 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3422 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.2466 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6153 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3687 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.7708 million SLC per square kilometre 1.14 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3704 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 1.39 million SLC per square kilometre 1.51 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1209 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Algeria or Iceland?
Algeria, at 1.85 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.64 million SLC per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Algeria and Iceland?
0.21 million SLC per square kilometre, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Algeria and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Algeria ranks 61st and Iceland ranks 64th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/algeria/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/algeria/iceland/">Algeria vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.