Andorra vs Ecuador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Andorra
0.0356 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0367 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Andorra rank
155th
Ecuador rank
154th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Andorra
  • Ecuador
00.010.020.030.04197019962023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0367 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0356 million SLC per square kilometre in Andorra, a difference of 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Andorra ranks 155th and Ecuador ranks 154th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Andorra averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Andorra Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0009 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0033 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.0038 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0088 million SLC per square kilometre 0.005 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.0088 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0135 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0047 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.02 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0067 million SLC per square kilometre Andorra
2010s 0.0294 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0294 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre Andorra
2020s 0.0327 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0343 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0016 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Andorra or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.0367 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0356 million SLC per square kilometre in Andorra as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Andorra and Ecuador?
0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Ecuador?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Andorra and Ecuador rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Andorra ranks 155th and Ecuador ranks 154th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Andorra vs Ecuador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/andorra/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/andorra/ecuador/">Andorra vs Ecuador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.