Angola vs Burkina Faso: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Angola
7.41 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso
7.36 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
41st
Burkina Faso rank
42nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Angola
  • Burkina Faso
02468197019962023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 7.41 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.36 million SLC per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.05 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Angola ranks 41st and Burkina Faso ranks 42nd of 180 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Burkina Faso Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2162 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2162 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1980s 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6394 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6394 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1990s 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre 1.35 million SLC per square kilometre 1.35 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 0.1288 million SLC per square kilometre 2.89 million SLC per square kilometre 2.76 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 1.07 million SLC per square kilometre 5.75 million SLC per square kilometre 4.68 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 4.95 million SLC per square kilometre 7.22 million SLC per square kilometre 2.27 million SLC per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Angola or Burkina Faso?
Angola, at 7.41 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.36 million SLC per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Angola and Burkina Faso?
0.05 million SLC per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Burkina Faso?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Angola and Burkina Faso rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Angola ranks 41st and Burkina Faso ranks 42nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Burkina Faso: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/angola/burkina-faso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/angola/burkina-faso/">Angola vs Burkina Faso: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.