Angola vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Angola
7.41 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
7.66 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
41st
Philippines rank
39th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Angola
  • Philippines
02468197019962023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 7.66 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.41 million SLC per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.25 million SLC per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 41st and Philippines ranks 39th of 180 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1032 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1032 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.422 million SLC per square kilometre 0.422 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
1990s 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre 1.26 million SLC per square kilometre 1.26 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
2000s 0.1288 million SLC per square kilometre 2.7 million SLC per square kilometre 2.57 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 1.07 million SLC per square kilometre 5.21 million SLC per square kilometre 4.15 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 4.95 million SLC per square kilometre 6.85 million SLC per square kilometre 1.9 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Angola or Philippines?
Philippines, at 7.66 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.41 million SLC per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Angola and Philippines?
0.25 million SLC per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Philippines?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Angola and Philippines rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Angola ranks 41st and Philippines ranks 39th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/angola/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/angola/philippines/">Angola vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.