Argentina vs Gambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Argentina
4.15 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
3.37 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
48th
Gambia rank
51st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Argentina
  • Gambia
01234197019962023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 4.15 million SLC per square kilometre against 3.37 million SLC per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.78 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.2 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Argentina ranks 48th and Gambia ranks 51st of 180 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Gambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0337 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0337 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1136 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1136 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.0044 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2812 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2768 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 0.0162 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7805 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7642 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 0.1509 million SLC per square kilometre 1.38 million SLC per square kilometre 1.23 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 2 million SLC per square kilometre 2.63 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6259 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Argentina or Gambia?
Argentina, at 4.15 million SLC per square kilometre against 3.37 million SLC per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Argentina and Gambia?
0.78 million SLC per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Gambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Gambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Argentina ranks 48th and Gambia ranks 51st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Gambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/argentina/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/argentina/gambia-the/">Argentina vs Gambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.