How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Argentina

4.15 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

5.07 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Argentina rank

48th

Serbia rank

45th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Argentina
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 5.07 million SLC per square kilometre against 4.15 million SLC per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0.92 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 180 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0243 million SLC per square kilometre	2.11 million SLC per square kilometre	2.09 million SLC per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	0.1509 million SLC per square kilometre	3.27 million SLC per square kilometre	3.12 million SLC per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	2 million SLC per square kilometre	4.84 million SLC per square kilometre	2.84 million SLC per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Argentina or Serbia?: Serbia, at 5.07 million SLC per square kilometre against 4.15 million SLC per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Argentina and Serbia?: 0.92 million SLC per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Argentina ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/argentina/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/argentina/serbia/">Argentina vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit: million SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.