Aruba vs Australia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Aruba
0.0091 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia
0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
170th
Australia rank
172nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Aruba
  • Australia
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01197019962023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0091 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 170th and Australia ranks 172nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 4 and Australia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Australia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.001 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0015 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0021 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 0.0041 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 0.0058 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0051 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Aruba or Australia?
Aruba, at 0.0091 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Aruba and Australia?
0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Australia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Australia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Aruba ranks 170th and Australia ranks 172nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Australia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/aruba/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/aruba/australia/">Aruba vs Australia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.