Aruba vs Botswana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard
Aruba
0.0091 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
170th
Botswana rank
173rd
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time
- Aruba
- Botswana
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.0091 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 170th and Botswana ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1980s | 0.001 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1990s | 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0009 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0018 million SLC per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2000s | 0.0041 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0019 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0022 million SLC per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.0058 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0049 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0009 million SLC per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0069 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Aruba or Botswana?
- Aruba, at 0.0091 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Aruba and Botswana?
- 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Botswana?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Botswana rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Aruba ranks 170th and Botswana ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.