Australia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time
- Australia
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.006 million SLC per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 172nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 175th of 180 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0003 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre | Australia |
| 1980s | 0.0015 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre | Australia |
| 1990s | 0.0021 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0026 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0058 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0023 million SLC per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0051 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0046 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0049 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Australia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Australia, at 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.006 million SLC per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Australia ranks 172nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 175th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.