Austria vs Belarus: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Austria
0.0744 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus
0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
133rd
Belarus rank
130th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Austria
  • Belarus
00.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0744 million SLC per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 133rd and Belarus ranks 130th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Belarus in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 0.045 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.045 million SLC per square kilometre Austria
2000s 0.0439 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0411 million SLC per square kilometre Austria
2010s 0.0508 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0277 million SLC per square kilometre 0.023 million SLC per square kilometre Austria
2020s 0.0646 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0661 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0016 million SLC per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Austria or Belarus?
Belarus, at 0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0744 million SLC per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Austria and Belarus?
0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Austria and Belarus rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Austria ranks 133rd and Belarus ranks 130th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Belarus: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/austria/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/austria/belarus/">Austria vs Belarus: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.