Austria vs El Salvador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Austria
0.0744 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0756 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
133rd
El Salvador rank
131st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Austria
  • El Salvador
0.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0756 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0744 million SLC per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 0.0012 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 133rd and El Salvador ranks 131st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and El Salvador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria El Salvador Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0308 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0223 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0085 million SLC per square kilometre Austria
1980s 0.0419 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0346 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0072 million SLC per square kilometre Austria
1990s 0.0462 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0448 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre Austria
2000s 0.0439 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0455 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0016 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0508 million SLC per square kilometre 0.065 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0143 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0646 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0699 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0054 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Austria or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0.0756 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0744 million SLC per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Austria and El Salvador?
0.0012 million SLC per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and El Salvador?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Austria and El Salvador rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Austria ranks 133rd and El Salvador ranks 131st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs El Salvador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/austria/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/austria/el-salvador/">Austria vs El Salvador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.