Bahamas vs Botswana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Bahamas
0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
174th
Botswana rank
173rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Bahamas
  • Botswana
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.001 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 174th and Botswana ranks 173rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 5 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Botswana Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0023 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0022 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0056 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.0088 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0009 million SLC per square kilometre 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0019 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0092 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0098 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0049 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0049 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0069 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Bahamas or Botswana?
Botswana, at 0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Bahamas and Botswana?
0.001 million SLC per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Botswana?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Botswana rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Bahamas ranks 174th and Botswana ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Botswana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/bahamas-the/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/bahamas-the/botswana/">Bahamas vs Botswana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.