Bahamas vs Libya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Bahamas
0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0.0047 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
174th
Libya rank
177th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Bahamas
  • Libya
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0047 million SLC per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.4 times Libya's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 174th and Libya ranks 177th of 180 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Libya Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0023 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0022 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.0088 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0083 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0103 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0098 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0016 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0082 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0036 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Bahamas or Libya?
Bahamas, at 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0047 million SLC per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Bahamas and Libya?
0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Libya?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Libya rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Bahamas ranks 174th and Libya ranks 177th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Libya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/bahamas-the/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/bahamas-the/libya/">Bahamas vs Libya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.