How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Brazil?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Brazil: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Belarus

0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Brazil

0.0789 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

130th

Brazil rank

128th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Belarus
Brazil

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0789 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Brazil ahead.

Belarus ranks 130th and Brazil ranks 128th of 180 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Brazil	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0037 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0037 million SLC per square kilometre	Brazil
2000s	0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0124 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0096 million SLC per square kilometre	Brazil
2010s	0.0277 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0303 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0025 million SLC per square kilometre	Brazil
2020s	0.0661 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0678 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0016 million SLC per square kilometre	Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Belarus or Brazil?: Brazil, at 0.0789 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Belarus and Brazil?: 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Brazil?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Brazil rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Belarus ranks 130th and Brazil ranks 128th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Brazil: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/belarus/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/belarus/brazil/">Belarus vs Brazil: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit: million SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.