Belarus vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Belarus
0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
0.075 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
130th
Spain rank
132nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Belarus
  • Spain
00.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.075 million SLC per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 0.0022 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Spain ahead.

Belarus ranks 130th and Spain ranks 132nd of 180 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Spain Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0393 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0393 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0516 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0488 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.0277 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0575 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0298 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2020s 0.0661 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0675 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0013 million SLC per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Belarus or Spain?
Belarus, at 0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.075 million SLC per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Belarus and Spain?
0.0022 million SLC per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Spain?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Spain rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Belarus ranks 130th and Spain ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/belarus/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/belarus/spain/">Belarus vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.