Bermuda vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Bermuda
0.3851 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.4375 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
90th
Malta rank
87th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Bermuda
  • Malta
00.20.40.60.8197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.4375 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.3851 million SLC per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 0.0524 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Bermuda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

Bermuda ranks 90th and Malta ranks 87th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 4 and Malta in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 0.068 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0699 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0019 million SLC per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.2007 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1449 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0558 million SLC per square kilometre Bermuda
1990s 0.3647 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2123 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1525 million SLC per square kilometre Bermuda
2000s 0.6112 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2773 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3339 million SLC per square kilometre Bermuda
2010s 0.3348 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2696 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0653 million SLC per square kilometre Bermuda
2020s 0.3556 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4089 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0533 million SLC per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Bermuda or Malta?
Malta, at 0.4375 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.3851 million SLC per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Bermuda and Malta?
0.0524 million SLC per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Malta?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Malta rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Bermuda ranks 90th and Malta ranks 87th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/bermuda/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/bermuda/malta/">Bermuda vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.