Bhutan vs Israel: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Bhutan
0.9783 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
0.9149 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
70th
Israel rank
71st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Bhutan
  • Israel
00.20.40.60.81197019962023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.9783 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.9149 million SLC per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.0634 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 70th and Israel ranks 71st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Israel Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0063 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0062 million SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.0195 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0494 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0299 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
1990s 0.0711 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2703 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1993 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
2000s 0.173 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5572 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3843 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.4411 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7974 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3562 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
2020s 0.863 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9312 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0682 million SLC per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Bhutan or Israel?
Bhutan, at 0.9783 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.9149 million SLC per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Bhutan and Israel?
0.0634 million SLC per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Israel?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Israel rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Bhutan ranks 70th and Israel ranks 71st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Israel: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/bhutan/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/bhutan/israel/">Bhutan vs Israel: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.