Burundi vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Burundi
118.47 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
42.61 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
11th
Myanmar rank
14th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Burundi
  • Myanmar
0255075100125197019962023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 118.47 million SLC per square kilometre against 42.61 million SLC per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 75.86 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 2.8 times Myanmar's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 11th and Myanmar ranks 14th of 180 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Myanmar Difference Ahead
1970s 0.7943 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0152 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7791 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0489 million SLC per square kilometre 2.44 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 5.02 million SLC per square kilometre 0.709 million SLC per square kilometre 4.32 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 16.48 million SLC per square kilometre 9.61 million SLC per square kilometre 6.88 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 61.3 million SLC per square kilometre 28.53 million SLC per square kilometre 32.77 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 104.14 million SLC per square kilometre 40.49 million SLC per square kilometre 63.64 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Burundi or Myanmar?
Burundi, at 118.47 million SLC per square kilometre against 42.61 million SLC per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Burundi and Myanmar?
75.86 million SLC per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Myanmar?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Myanmar rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Burundi ranks 11th and Myanmar ranks 14th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/burundi/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/burundi/myanmar/">Burundi vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.