Cambodia vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Cambodia
167.83 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
179.37 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
8th
Rwanda rank
7th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Cambodia
  • Rwanda
050100150200197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 179.37 million SLC per square kilometre against 167.83 million SLC per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 11.54 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Cambodia ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0309 million SLC per square kilometre 1.23 million SLC per square kilometre 1.2 million SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.2113 million SLC per square kilometre 3.02 million SLC per square kilometre 2.81 million SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 18.09 million SLC per square kilometre 5.83 million SLC per square kilometre 12.26 million SLC per square kilometre Cambodia
2000s 47.38 million SLC per square kilometre 19.69 million SLC per square kilometre 27.69 million SLC per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 112.99 million SLC per square kilometre 61.31 million SLC per square kilometre 51.68 million SLC per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 150.89 million SLC per square kilometre 132.05 million SLC per square kilometre 18.84 million SLC per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Cambodia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 179.37 million SLC per square kilometre against 167.83 million SLC per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Cambodia and Rwanda?
11.54 million SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Rwanda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Cambodia ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/cambodia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/cambodia/rwanda/">Cambodia vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.