Cameroon vs Chile: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Cameroon
10.94 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
13.36 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
36th
Chile rank
34th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Cameroon
  • Chile
051015197019962023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 13.36 million SLC per square kilometre against 10.94 million SLC per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 2.42 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Cameroon's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 36th and Chile ranks 34th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 4 and Chile in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Chile Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3503 million SLC per square kilometre 0.015 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3354 million SLC per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 1.13 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2825 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8489 million SLC per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 2.07 million SLC per square kilometre 1.96 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1126 million SLC per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 3.63 million SLC per square kilometre 3.51 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1236 million SLC per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 6.54 million SLC per square kilometre 7.95 million SLC per square kilometre 1.4 million SLC per square kilometre Chile
2020s 9.57 million SLC per square kilometre 11.98 million SLC per square kilometre 2.41 million SLC per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Cameroon or Chile?
Chile, at 13.36 million SLC per square kilometre against 10.94 million SLC per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Cameroon and Chile?
2.42 million SLC per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Chile?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Chile rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Cameroon ranks 36th and Chile ranks 34th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Chile: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/cameroon/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/cameroon/chile/">Cameroon vs Chile: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.