Canada vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Canada
0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0032 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
176th
Zimbabwe rank
179th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Canada
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.006197019962023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0032 million SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.8 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Canada ranks 176th and Zimbabwe ranks 179th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0029 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0012 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0023 million SLC per square kilometre 0.004 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0029 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0039 million SLC per square kilometre 0.004 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0053 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0046 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Canada or Zimbabwe?
Canada, at 0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0032 million SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Canada and Zimbabwe?
0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Canada and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Canada ranks 176th and Zimbabwe ranks 179th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/canada/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/canada/zimbabwe/">Canada vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.