Colombia vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Colombia
123.81 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
179.37 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
10th
Rwanda rank
7th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Colombia
  • Rwanda
050100150200197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 179.37 million SLC per square kilometre against 123.81 million SLC per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 55.56 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Colombia ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0963 million SLC per square kilometre 1.23 million SLC per square kilometre 1.13 million SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.8947 million SLC per square kilometre 3.02 million SLC per square kilometre 2.13 million SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 7.53 million SLC per square kilometre 5.83 million SLC per square kilometre 1.7 million SLC per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 22.42 million SLC per square kilometre 19.69 million SLC per square kilometre 2.72 million SLC per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 43.52 million SLC per square kilometre 61.31 million SLC per square kilometre 17.79 million SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 98.12 million SLC per square kilometre 132.05 million SLC per square kilometre 33.93 million SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Colombia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 179.37 million SLC per square kilometre against 123.81 million SLC per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Colombia and Rwanda?
55.56 million SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Rwanda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Colombia ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/colombia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/colombia/rwanda/">Colombia vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.