Comoros vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Comoros
125.04 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
223.36 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Comoros rank
9th
Uganda rank
6th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Comoros
  • Uganda
050100150200197019962023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 223.36 million SLC per square kilometre against 125.04 million SLC per square kilometre in Comoros, a difference of 98.32 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.8 times Comoros's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 6th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 2.96 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre 2.96 million SLC per square kilometre Comoros
1980s 13.84 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5972 million SLC per square kilometre 13.24 million SLC per square kilometre Comoros
1990s 27.45 million SLC per square kilometre 11.01 million SLC per square kilometre 16.44 million SLC per square kilometre Comoros
2000s 52.62 million SLC per square kilometre 30.85 million SLC per square kilometre 21.77 million SLC per square kilometre Comoros
2010s 73.04 million SLC per square kilometre 116.78 million SLC per square kilometre 43.74 million SLC per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 110.03 million SLC per square kilometre 198.2 million SLC per square kilometre 88.17 million SLC per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Comoros or Uganda?
Uganda, at 223.36 million SLC per square kilometre against 125.04 million SLC per square kilometre in Comoros as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Comoros and Uganda?
98.32 million SLC per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Uganda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Comoros ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 6th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/comoros/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/comoros/uganda/">Comoros vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.