Costa Rica vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Costa Rica
35.03 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
40.53 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
18th
Malawi rank
15th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Malawi
010203040197019962023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 40.53 million SLC per square kilometre against 35.03 million SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 5.5 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 18th and Malawi ranks 15th of 180 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0606 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0541 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.6613 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0175 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6437 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 4.9 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1833 million SLC per square kilometre 4.72 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 15.63 million SLC per square kilometre 1.57 million SLC per square kilometre 14.06 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 27.67 million SLC per square kilometre 10.31 million SLC per square kilometre 17.36 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 34.22 million SLC per square kilometre 31.43 million SLC per square kilometre 2.8 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Costa Rica or Malawi?
Malawi, at 40.53 million SLC per square kilometre against 35.03 million SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Costa Rica and Malawi?
5.5 million SLC per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malawi?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Malawi rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Costa Rica ranks 18th and Malawi ranks 15th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/costa-rica/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/costa-rica/malawi/">Costa Rica vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.