Croatia vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Croatia
0.0468 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0.0441 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia rank
149th
Papua New Guinea rank
151st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Croatia
  • Papua New Guinea
00.010.020.030.040.05197019962023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.0468 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0441 million SLC per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Croatia ranks 149th and Papua New Guinea ranks 151st of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0148 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0045 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0104 million SLC per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 0.0263 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0109 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0154 million SLC per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0.0267 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0235 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0033 million SLC per square kilometre Croatia
2020s 0.0378 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0396 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0018 million SLC per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Croatia or Papua New Guinea?
Croatia, at 0.0468 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0441 million SLC per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Croatia and Papua New Guinea?
0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Papua New Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Croatia ranks 149th and Papua New Guinea ranks 151st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/croatia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/croatia/papua-new-guinea/">Croatia vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.