How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Iceland?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Czechia

1.71 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland

1.64 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Czechia rank

63rd

Iceland rank

64th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Czechia
Iceland

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 1.71 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.64 million SLC per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.07 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 63rd and Iceland ranks 64th of 180 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Czechia	Iceland	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.8582 million SLC per square kilometre	0.4426 million SLC per square kilometre	0.4155 million SLC per square kilometre	Czechia
2000s	0.9757 million SLC per square kilometre	0.6153 million SLC per square kilometre	0.3604 million SLC per square kilometre	Czechia
2010s	1.26 million SLC per square kilometre	1.14 million SLC per square kilometre	0.1198 million SLC per square kilometre	Czechia
2020s	1.63 million SLC per square kilometre	1.51 million SLC per square kilometre	0.1167 million SLC per square kilometre	Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Czechia or Iceland?: Czechia, at 1.71 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.64 million SLC per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Czechia and Iceland?: 0.07 million SLC per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Iceland?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Czechia ranks 63rd and Iceland ranks 64th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/czechia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/czechia/iceland/">Czechia vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit: million SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.