Denmark vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Denmark
0.5306 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.4411 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
84th
Mozambique rank
86th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Denmark
  • Mozambique
00.20.40.60.8197019962023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0.5306 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.4411 million SLC per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0895 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 84th and Mozambique ranks 86th of 180 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 0.267 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2669 million SLC per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 0.6113 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6109 million SLC per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 0.6729 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0115 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6614 million SLC per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 0.547 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0632 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4838 million SLC per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 0.6081 million SLC per square kilometre 0.207 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4011 million SLC per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 0.6263 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3836 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2427 million SLC per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Denmark or Mozambique?
Denmark, at 0.5306 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.4411 million SLC per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Denmark and Mozambique?
0.0895 million SLC per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Mozambique?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Mozambique rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Denmark ranks 84th and Mozambique ranks 86th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/denmark/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/denmark/mozambique/">Denmark vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.