El Salvador vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

El Salvador
0.0756 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.072 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
131st
Suriname rank
134th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • El Salvador
  • Suriname
00.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0756 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.072 million SLC per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0036 million SLC per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 131st and Suriname ranks 134th of 180 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0223 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0223 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0346 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0346 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.0448 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0444 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0455 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0041 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0414 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.065 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0128 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0522 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0699 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0426 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0274 million SLC per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, El Salvador or Suriname?
El Salvador, at 0.0756 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.072 million SLC per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between El Salvador and Suriname?
0.0036 million SLC per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Suriname?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Suriname rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
El Salvador ranks 131st and Suriname ranks 134th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/el-salvador/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/el-salvador/suriname/">El Salvador vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.