Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Equatorial Guinea
7.56 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
7.91 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th
Nepal rank
38th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Nepal
02468197019962023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 7.91 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.56 million SLC per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.35 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nepal ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 38th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0387 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0706 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0319 million SLC per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0.1556 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1788 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0232 million SLC per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.4162 million SLC per square kilometre 0.618 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2018 million SLC per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 2.48 million SLC per square kilometre 1.42 million SLC per square kilometre 1.06 million SLC per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 4.9 million SLC per square kilometre 4.34 million SLC per square kilometre 0.559 million SLC per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 7.07 million SLC per square kilometre 6.97 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1037 million SLC per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Equatorial Guinea or Nepal?
Nepal, at 7.91 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.56 million SLC per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?
0.35 million SLC per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Nepal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 38th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/equatorial-guinea/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/equatorial-guinea/nepal/">Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.