France vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

France
0.0911 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0838 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
123rd
New Zealand rank
125th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • France
  • New Zealand
00.020.040.060.080.1197019962023

How they compare

France currently reports 0.0911 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0838 million SLC per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0073 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes France's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was France ahead.

France ranks 123rd and New Zealand ranks 125th of 180 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0207 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0048 million SLC per square kilometre 0.016 million SLC per square kilometre France
1980s 0.0418 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0129 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0289 million SLC per square kilometre France
1990s 0.0522 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0295 million SLC per square kilometre France
2000s 0.0525 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0349 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0176 million SLC per square kilometre France
2010s 0.0594 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0555 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0039 million SLC per square kilometre France
2020s 0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0755 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0018 million SLC per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, France or New Zealand?
France, at 0.0911 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0838 million SLC per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between France and New Zealand?
0.0073 million SLC per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do France and New Zealand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
France ranks 123rd and New Zealand ranks 125th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/france/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/france/new-zealand/">France vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.