French Polynesia vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

French Polynesia
5.32 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
5.07 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
44th
Serbia rank
45th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Serbia
0246197019962023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 5.32 million SLC per square kilometre against 5.07 million SLC per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.25 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 45th of 180 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 4.13 million SLC per square kilometre 2.11 million SLC per square kilometre 2.01 million SLC per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 4.67 million SLC per square kilometre 3.27 million SLC per square kilometre 1.4 million SLC per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 4.89 million SLC per square kilometre 4.84 million SLC per square kilometre 0.042 million SLC per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, French Polynesia or Serbia?
French Polynesia, at 5.32 million SLC per square kilometre against 5.07 million SLC per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between French Polynesia and Serbia?
0.25 million SLC per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Serbia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
French Polynesia ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 45th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/french-polynesia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/french-polynesia/serbia/">French Polynesia vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.