Gambia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Gambia
3.37 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
3.01 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
51st
Thailand rank
52nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Gambia
  • Thailand
0123197019962023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 3.37 million SLC per square kilometre against 3.01 million SLC per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 0.36 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Thailand ahead.

Gambia ranks 51st and Thailand ranks 52nd of 180 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0337 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1597 million SLC per square kilometre 0.126 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 0.1136 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3959 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2823 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.2812 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6865 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4052 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.7805 million SLC per square kilometre 1.35 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5691 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 1.38 million SLC per square kilometre 2.57 million SLC per square kilometre 1.19 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 2.63 million SLC per square kilometre 2.85 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2193 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Gambia or Thailand?
Gambia, at 3.37 million SLC per square kilometre against 3.01 million SLC per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Gambia and Thailand?
0.36 million SLC per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Thailand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Thailand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Gambia ranks 51st and Thailand ranks 52nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/gambia-the/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/gambia-the/thailand/">Gambia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.