Ghana vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Ghana
0.7806 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.8281 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
75th
Nicaragua rank
74th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Ghana
  • Nicaragua
00.20.40.60.8197019962023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.8281 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.7806 million SLC per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.0475 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 75th and Nicaragua ranks 74th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre Ghana
1980s 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre Ghana
1990s 0.0023 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0471 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0448 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.0269 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1459 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1189 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.1594 million SLC per square kilometre 0.429 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2696 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.5078 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7017 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1939 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Ghana or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0.8281 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.7806 million SLC per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Ghana and Nicaragua?
0.0475 million SLC per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Nicaragua?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Nicaragua rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Ghana ranks 75th and Nicaragua ranks 74th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/ghana/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/ghana/nicaragua/">Ghana vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.